By Willow G11 and William G10

Introduction and Background Information

The freedom of the press is a fundamental aspect of democratic societies. Having the ability to recognise the rights of press in numerous international engagements. The Human Rights Council will discuss the topic of freedom of the press within wartimes, and the tension between safeguarding national security. While a free press is key to uncovering war crimes–ensuring accountability and informing global audiences–the release of national information can be a serious threat, endangering the lives of journalists and reporters, as well as compromising key military strategies. The delegations will discuss how governments can protect national security, whilst ensuring that the press remains free and independent will be outlined.

Resolution 1  

An overwhelming majority of delegates agree the press should be regulated, to safeguard countries, while also allowing freedom of speech. However, the resolution guided by the delegations  of the United Kingdom, Syria, and the United States, underlines the delicate interplay between safeguarding press freedom and expressing the urges of national security and safety during armed conflict. Acknowledging the spread of misinformation amplified by misleading news on social media produced through fear and uncertainty. The resolution submitted by the delegation of the United Kingdom, proposes steps, including the adoption of National Ethical Journalism Charters and enhanced media literacy programs. These initiatives aim for evidence-based, balanced reporting while minimising fear induced writing and journalism. The creation of a UNHRC media advisory panel reflects commitment to supporting member states navigating the complexities of wartime journalism without imposing regulations that reduce freedom of speech and fluency throughout global journalism. The resolution strikes a balance between democratic ideology and the necessity of protecting public safety. Urging the international community to confront issues of propaganda and incorrect information and replace it with unity and purpose.

Resolution 2

The resolution submitted by the delegations of Saudi Arabia and Russian Federation underlines the necessity for regulating press freedom during wartime conflicts, preserving sovereignty and stability. The delegates of Saudi Arabia and the Russian Federation recognize the power of the media to shape public opinion and perception. The resolution reaffirms the importance of government controlled media as tools to stop misinformation. Provisions encourage journalist training on how to handle sensitive information, establish safe zones for reporting and focus on aligning independent journalism and national interests. The resolution wants a balanced approach to safeguard security and public trust. While noticing risks of misuse, the resolution focuses on citizens’ possibility to recognize misinformation, while pushing for efforts of collective responsibility for stability during crises.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the debate between the freedom of press throughout wartime conflicts and the tension between upholding democratic values and safeguarding national security has been upheld. One resolution, submitted by the delegations of China, Ukraine and other countries, advocates for the freedom of press based on accountability, while also supporting guidelines to make sure journalists participate in responsible reporting, combating misinformation and protecting themselves in the process. The opposing resolution, led by the delegates Saudi Arabia and Russia, advises tight media regulations, through the role of government controlled frameworks, defending against misinformation and propaganda, protecting sovereignty and unity. Both apply great emphasis on the role of media during wartime, yet they separate on the level of state intervention, and transparency with security and information.